MATH · IN · MODELS

Concept directions anti-concentrate in the unembedding's low-variance spectral tail

measured in 1 paper

Acharya, Rimal & Dhakal project concept diff-of-means vectors onto the unembedding-covariance eigenbasis across 17 models in 5 families [acharya-rimal-dhakal-2026-spectral-anti-concentration] Concept-direction energy anti-concentrates in the low-eigenvalue tail: Spectral Center of Mass averages 0.926 versus 0.758 for random directions (Gini-deviation -0.282) [acharya-rimal-dhakal-2026-spectral-anti-concentration] Static unembedding-row contrasts show the opposite sign, and POS/syntax directions concentrate in the high-variance subspace in 6 of 8 architectures (p<0.013), a genuine dual-geometry split [acharya-rimal-dhakal-2026-spectral-anti-concentration] On Llama-3.1-8B, injecting only the top-10%-eigenvalue component gives +383% perplexity versus +223% for the bottom-10% component (Cohen's d=1.80), replicated across 5 models [acharya-rimal-dhakal-2026-spectral-anti-concentration]

Context

spectral center of mass (SCM), Gini-deviation spectral anti-concentration score, unembedding covariance eigenbasis, dual geometry (concept vs. syntax spectral location), split-injection steering (top-10% vs. bottom-10% eigencomponents)

Papers

Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations — Acharya, Pratyush, Rimal, Nuraj, Dhakal, Habish2026 · arXiv:2605.01609